The Indian government has set a bold new ambition, sparking a flurry of discussion under the banner of PSB Manthan. The mission? To catapult at least two of India's Public Sector Banks (PSBs) into the elite club of the world's top 20 largest banks.
But what's the reality on the ground? Right now, out of India's 12 government-owned banks, only the State Bank of India (SBI) features in the global top 100, and its rank often hovers between 43rd and 50th. While SBI is a giant within India, it's a modest player on the world stage, especially when compared to the colossal banks of China and the USA.
The government's goal is clear, but the path to achieving it is complex and points toward one inevitable strategy: mega-mergers.
Understanding How Banks are Ranked: Assets vs. Market Value
Before diving into the "why" of mergers, it's crucial to understand how banks are measured. There are two primary metrics:
- Asset Size: This is the total value of everything a bank owns—the loans it has given, investments it has made, and physical properties. Think of this as the bank's sheer size and scale. The government's top-20 goal is based on this metric.
- Market Capitalization (Market Cap): This is the total value of a bank's shares on the stock market. It reflects investor confidence, profitability, and perceived value.
Interestingly, Indian banks perform very differently on these two scales. While SBI is the largest by assets, private banks like HDFC Bank and ICICI Bank often have a much higher market cap, with HDFC sometimes even breaking into the global top 10. This shows that while PSBs are large, investors often have more faith in the profitability and efficiency of private players.
The government's goal is to increase the global ranking of Indian PSBs by asset size.
The Inevitable Path: Why Mergers are the Only Option
The government might be hesitant to use the "M-word" to avoid political debate, but the numbers don't lie. Achieving a top-20 rank in asset size is mathematically impossible without consolidation.
Consider this stunning hypothetical: If we were to merge all 12 of India's PSBs into one single entity today, their combined assets would total roughly $2 trillion. Where would that place this new mega-bank on the global list? Around the 13th spot.
Now, compare that to the world's largest bank, the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, which boasts assets worth over $6.3 trillion. This single Chinese bank is more than three times larger than all of India's public sector banks combined. This stark comparison makes it clear: organic growth isn't enough. To compete, India needs to create bigger banks through mergers.
This isn't a new concept.
- In 2017, SBI was merged with its five associate banks.
- In 2019, a major consolidation saw 10 PSBs merged into just four, bringing the total count down from 27 to the current 12. "PSB Manthan" is simply the next chapter in this story.
The Potential Upsides of Creating Bigger Banks
Merging banks isn't just about climbing a global leaderboard. There are tangible economic benefits.
1. Funding Big Dreams
A larger bank has a bigger wallet. Merged entities can fund massive, nation-building projects like highways, airports, and large factories—loans that are too large for smaller individual banks to handle. This financial muscle is crucial for economic growth and reduces the need for Indian corporations to seek funding from foreign giants like JP Morgan Chase.
2. Efficiency and Cost Savings
Why have 12 separate head offices, 12 treasury departments, and thousands of overlapping branches and ATMs? Mergers lead to economies of scale, cutting down on redundant operational costs and making the banking system more efficient and profitable.
3. Boosting Profitability
At the PSB Manthan meeting, a key focus was on improving the CASA (Current Account and Savings Account) ratio. These deposits are a source of cheap funds for banks, as they pay little to no interest on them. A larger, more efficient bank can better attract these low-cost deposits, lending the money out at higher rates and significantly boosting its profitability.
The Downside: What Could We Lose?
However, the push for bigger banks comes with significant risks, especially for the common person.
1. Financial Exclusion
PSBs have long been the bank of the masses, serving remote villages and lower-income citizens. Larger, profit-driven mega-banks might shift their focus away from this social responsibility. They could introduce higher minimum balance requirements or close down rural branches that aren't very profitable, leaving millions behind.
2. Neglecting Priority Sectors
Government-owned banks are mandated to lend a certain portion of their money to "priority sectors" like agriculture and small businesses (MSMEs). These loans are vital for the backbone of the Indian economy but are often seen as high-risk and low-profit. A consolidated banking system might be less willing to support farmers and small entrepreneurs.
3. Reduced Competition
Fewer banks mean less choice for customers. This could potentially lead to higher fees, lower interest rates on deposits, and poorer customer service in the long run.
In Conclusion
PSB Manthan sets India on a path of ambitious financial reform. The goal of creating globally competitive banks is a logical step for a growing economic superpower. However, this ambition must be balanced with the social contract that PSBs have with the Indian people.
The challenge for the government is to create banks that are big enough to compete on the world stage, yet still committed to serving the smallest customer in the most remote village. It's a difficult balancing act, but one that will define the future of Indian banking.
Post a Comment